Why does ChatGPT recommend them, not you?
Because it is quoting other people's pages — directories, review sites, roundups — and you are not on them. We ask your category's forty buying questions on ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude, record which pages get quoted back, and hand you the list of the ones answering without you: which competitor is already there, exactly what it takes to get in, and the corrected files themselves.
Gemini: crawler access checked (Google-Extended), citations not sampled. Google AI Overviews has no crawler of its own — it is part of Search and follows your Googlebot rules. Every one of those choices is printed on the cover of your report, in the same size as the engine's name, because a setting nobody mentions is a claim nobody can check.
free two-page snapshot in 24h
No logins, no analytics access, no admin accounts, ever.
What we measure, and what we then go and do
Every finding comes with the job that fixes it
Anyone can hand you a list of problems. A list of forty problems in no order is not an audit, it is homework. Every line below arrives with an address, a first step, and an honest estimate of what it costs to do.
no admin accounts — nothing to revoke afterwards.
The directory, review and roundup pages that answer your category's questions with your competitor on them and you absent.
Name each venue, the way in, and what it costs you in time — G2, Trustpilot, Clutch, Crunchbase and whichever came up for your category: which of them you can add yourself this afternoon, which need an editor pitched, which need nothing but a form. We do not create or claim accounts on your behalf, here or anywhere. You hold your own logins — that is the same sentence as "no admin accounts, ever", and it has to stay true in both directions.
Which of fifteen named AI crawlers your robots.txt lets through, and which it quietly shuts out.
Quote the lines that shut them out, and name the replacement agent by agent. Your developer edits one file. Two minutes of their time. We know the shape of a good answer because ours is one: answrap.com/robots.txt admits 21 agents by name — more than we audit for, and more than any of the ten sites we read on 29 July, including an SEO agency that scored 96 on this pillar without naming one. Open our file and yours side by side; it takes ten seconds and it is the only vendor claim on this page you can check before you email us.
Whether a machine can tell what you sell: Organization, sameAs, FAQPage, breadcrumbs, sitemap, llms.txt.
Name every missing field against the markup you already have — property by property, checked against your live JSON-LD rather than against a generic checklist, so your developer is reading a diff and not a tutorial. Subtypes count: if you have marked yourself up as a Dentist we do not tell you that you are missing Organization. Most checkers do.
Your name, address and website written differently in every place they appear — which is how a model ends up unsure you are one company.
List every place it differs, with the exact string it should read, and name which profiles are missing the link back to your site. Editing them is a few minutes each, and it is your account, not ours.
Page by page, not just the home page — up to twelve pages from your sitemap, and the report says how many that was out of how many you list: does the text survive without JavaScript, is there one H1, is any heading shaped like a question a buyer asks.
Hand over the exact headings to use, taken word for word from the questions you are absent from — so the heading matches the question a buyer actually typed, not one a copywriter guessed at. The body copy under them is yours to write; nobody outside your company should be putting words in your mouth.
Writing blog posts, comparison pages or FAQ copy. Link building. Internal-linking analysis — we read the pages your sitemap lists, up to 400 of them, but which page links to which is classic SEO, it is not what decides a citation, and we do not pretend to measure it. Anything requiring a login to your CMS. Posting on Reddit or Quora as you: that has to be a real person at your company, openly, and we will say so rather than fake it.
We cannot make ChatGPT recommend you. Nobody can.
Answer engines are non-deterministic and personalised — two people asking the same question get different answers. So we measure what is real: whether you can be cited at all, and whether that is improving. Any vendor quoting a precise, stable “AI visibility percentage” is over-claiming.
And where we could not measure something, the report says so on the line itself — not in a footnote, not as a zero. A pillar we could not reach gets no score at all, and the reason is printed in its place. That rule is why the score you get is worth arguing with: every number in the document is marked as measured, derived, or unknown, and you can tell which is which without asking us.
The rules of this category are not written yet
In search, the pages that answer your category's questions were settled a decade ago and are owned by somebody else. Here they are not settled. That is the whole opportunity, and it has a shelf life.
buying questions where the engine had not settled on an answer — three identical asks, three different sets of pages quoted back.
Run #20: our own frozen 40-question corpus, asked three times each through Perplexity, 120 calls. One engine, one domain, one day — so read it as a sample of how unsettled this category is, not as a law of nature. It is the number we have, and we are telling you exactly how thin it is.
An unsettled question is a question where the position is still open. There is no established arbiter site for AI answers the way there is for search rankings — no directory everyone defers to, no scoreboard everyone quotes. The pages the engines reach for today were mostly written for other reasons and are winning by default. Being on them now costs a profile and a paragraph. It will not stay that cheap.
Fixed prices, published
Full audit
- ✓40 category questions, asked on ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude — 120 live answers, every one recorded and quoted back at you
- ✓Where the three engines disagree about you — reported as a finding, not averaged away
- ✓The pages answering your category without you — ranked by what it costs to get on them
- ✓Which of your competitors is already on each one
- ✓The questions you were never once cited on, listed word for word
- →Every venue named, with the link to its signup page, what you need in hand before you start, and how long it takes
- →The wording to use — taken from the exact questions you are absent from, so the profile answers them
- →The exact robots.txt lines to change, quoted from your current file — your developer edits one file
- →The structured-data fields you are missing, named one by one against what your markup already has
- →Every place your name, address or website is written differently, listed so you can make them match
- →Your robots.txt, written out in full — the corrected file with the changed lines marked, not a description of them
- →The structured data as a finished block — the business type, address, coordinates and services you are missing, every field filled from what your own site and listings already say. Nothing invented.
- →The profile links block, assembled — every listing of yours we found, gathered into one place so the engines resolve you as one company instead of several
- →Your headings, written out — taken word for word from the questions you are absent from. The heading is ours, the answer underneath stays yours.
- →One free re-check after you publish — we confirm the files landed and are read correctly. Costs you nothing and takes us minutes.
- ✓Two pages: one detailed, one plain-language to forward
- ✓The raw engine answers this run was built from, kept and re-checkable — so any figure in the report can be traced back to the reply it came from
- ✓Five working days · still no logins to your site
- —We do not write the words on your pages. That is a claim about your business, and only you can say whether it is true.
- —We do not open accounts or claim listings for you. No logins, ever.
- —Files come to you for review. We never touch your live site, so we can never break it.
Site check
- ✓15 AI crawlers checked by name
- ✓Structured data, sitemap and llms.txt read — up to twelve pages from your sitemap, not just the home page. The report states how many of your listed pages were read, and how many you list in total.
- ✓3 of your real buying questions asked live, once each, on one engine we name — with the pages that were quoted back
- ✓Every finding names the file it came from
- ✓Same day, no call, no card
- —One engine only. Whether the engines disagree about you is a paid finding, because seeing it takes more than one
- —Nothing is built for you at this tier — the free check reads and reports, nothing more
Watch
- ✓The same 40 questions, asked the same way — so the months actually compare
- ✓Events, not percentages: a new source entered the answer set, a competitor appeared, a page stopped being quoted
- →The queue re-ordered every month as the category moves, so you always know the next thing worth doing
- ✓We tell you the day your own site update breaks the markup — that is how most of this quietly reverses
- ✓A month with nothing in it is reported as a quiet month, not padded
- ✓Cancel any time, runs to the end of the paid period
Agencies — priced by category, not by brand
- ✓One category covers every client you have in it — the forty questions are the category's, not one brand's, so the run is bought once
- ✓A client-facing page you can forward as it is, or with your logo on it
- ✓A per-brand work order for each of your clients inside the category
- ✓We never contact your clients, ever
- ✓Each further category is a further €490, on the same terms
- ✓Every figure traceable to the raw engine answer behind it, if your client asks where it came from